There is no hiding that, in the world of engineering, embracing a “left-to-right thinking” methodology is crucial. This specific mindset allows you to bring into focus the end of your project right from the outset.
Need to produce construction deliverables in a completions-ready fashion? Breaking down the intricate process into commissionable systems offers you the chance to ideate steps to aid both an efficient and safe plan of action.
How can you achieve this? Here, we take a look at the benefits of early engagement while outlining the detrimental aspects of overlooking timely planning.
Early engagement vs late engagement An early engagement approach encourages engineers to envision the completed project from the very beginning. To hit the ground running, and to ensure everything falls smoothly into place, it is important to collaborate with vendors and construction partners. By doing so, you are holding these parties to account while making sure that all the elements work together.
Ultimately, a successful completion philosophy spurs you to follow the project from its earliest stages. This includes paying close attention to design and engineering, discipline-level construction, and handover. What you are doing is keeping an eye on the project’s lifecycle, from mechanical completion to pre-commissioning, commissioning, start-up, and operations.
Late engagement of completions on the project, instead, can conceal an array of negative consequences. Why? Firstly, it can result in substantial delays, which will end up slowing down your plans. Secondly, your costs may overrun. In fact, construction will race ahead with no visibility of how, or when, the systems being built can be livened up for pre-commissioning. Defects in construction may not delay the mechanical completion of parts of the plan. However, they can hinder commissioning and, therefore, a safe and timely start-up.
Embedding a completions management system early in the project can prevent these unwanted obstacles. In fact, it will provide you with immediate visibility of progress towards the eventual commissioning and start-up of both systems and subsystems. Not only that, but it will help you differentiate and report on construction and pre-commissioning activities by discipline.
What’s more, a completions management system allows you to save check-sheets and handover certification. It also enables you to store auditable tracking, resolution of punch listing, and technical queries.
Missing a completions approach and baseline standard for the supply chain at the FEED (Front End Engineering Design) or pre-FID (Final Investment Decision) stages can cause issues. This would mean, in fact, that the standard is not woven into the contract clauses of the project’s supply chain. In this scenario, QA and QC (quality assessment and quality control) variations in the supply chain would take precedence over your own specific plans. This makes it difficult to acquire a common standard for completions or TI (technical integrity) assurance throughout the project delivery.
Useful steps to follow Having a specific process in place will facilitate the positive outcome of your operations. But what should effective planning and preparation look like?
Here are a few steps you may want to take:
Conversely, if you lack a solid baseline, the handover quality and status are more difficult to quantify and evaluate. This may also lead to having to deal with problems that have been left untracked and, therefore, unresolved in significant volume. Ultimately, it can represent a blow to your operations and leave you with very little time to fix any unwanted issue.
To conclude, early engagement within a project has a wide range of benefits. Leaving it late to check or organise your plan of action, instead, can hinder the correct flow of the operations. With a few steps in mind, a completions management system can pave the way toward a smooth, linear, and successful outcome.
Add Chart to Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
- Enrich the conversation
- Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
- Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
- Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
- NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
- Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
- Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
- Only English comments will be allowed.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.