In a significant ruling on Thursday, a federal court in Amarillo, Texas, upheld a Biden administration policy that encourages the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into employee retirement plans. The decision, handed down by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court, dismissed a legal challenge initiated by 26 states earlier this year.
The states' lawsuit, which began in January, argued that the policy violated federal laws governing retirement plans. They maintained that Congress had not explicitly stated whether ESG factors could be used to determine investment strategies. However, Judge Kacsmaryk's 14-page opinion refuted this claim.
In May, the states involved in the lawsuit - led by Texas and Utah - requested a summary judgment to rule in their favor. The Labor Department responded by filing its own motion for summary judgment, which was granted by Judge Kacsmaryk this week.
The ruling comes amidst an ongoing debate about whether retirement investors should consider environmental and social factors in their investments. This question has been a political issue for several years. In 2020, under President Donald Trump's administration, the Labor Department sought new regulations discouraging such considerations. However, this changed in 2021 when President Biden came into office and proposed rule changes making it easier for retirement plans to incorporate these social factors.
These changes were implemented on January 30th. However, Congress passed a measure blocking them in March after two Democratic senators sided with Senate Republicans against Biden's rule changes. Later that month, President Biden vetoed this measure, preserving the Labor Department's rule.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
Add Chart to Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
- Enrich the conversation
- Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
- Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
- Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
- NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
- Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
- Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
- Only English comments will be allowed.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.