(Adds France, Italy, Germany views, next steps at WTO)
By Philip Blenkinsop
BRUSSELS, May 6 (Reuters) - The European Union is willing to discuss a proposal, now backed by the United States, to waive intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said on Thursday.
The head of the EU executive said the bloc's vaccination effort was accelerating, with 30 Europeans being inoculated per second, while exporting more than 200 million vaccine doses to the rest of the world - contrasting with limited sharing of vaccines by the United States and Britain.
"The EU is also ready to discuss any proposals that address the crisis in an effective and pragmatic manner," von der Leyen said in a speech to the European University Institute in Florence.
"That's why we are ready to discuss how the U.S. proposal for a waiver on intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines could help achieve that objective."
Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio said Italy supported suspending patents, commenting on his Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ) page that Europe should not miss the opportunity and be courageous.
French President Emmanuel Macron said he was "very much in favour" of opening up intellectual property. However, a French government official said lack of production capacity and upstream components was the problem, not patents.
"I would remind you that it is the United States which has not exported a single dose to other countries and which is now talking about lifting the patents," the official said.
German Health Minister Jens Spahn said he shared the U.S. president's goal of providing the whole world with vaccines.
WAIVER SCEPTICS SAY IT WILL NOT BOOST PRODUCTION
South Africa and India made the initial vaccine waiver proposal at the World Trade Organization in October, gathering support from a large number of developing countries that say it is a vital step to make vaccines more widely available.
The World Health Organization said in April that of 700 million vaccines globally administered, only 0.2% had been in low-income countries.
Until now, the European Union has been with a group of countries, many of them home to large pharmaceutical companies, including Britain and Switzerland, that have opposed the waiver.
They argue it would undermine incentives for firms who have produced vaccines in record time to do so in a future pandemic. They also say waiving patents would not instantly resolve the problem, with a lack of sufficient manufacturing capacity.
Vaccine-making is also complicated, as evidenced by production problems of AstraZeneca AZN.L , and would also require a transfer of technology, know-how and personnel.
Von der Leyen said that, in the short run, the EU called upon all vaccine-producing countries to allow exports and to avoid measures that disrupt supply chains.
A Commission spokeswoman said this comment was not aimed at any country in particular.
The United States said on Wednesday it supported the waiver, although trade chief Katherine Tai cautioned that negotiations would take time. chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called Biden's move a "monumental moment".
The Commission only heard of the announcement moments before it came out, the spokeswoman said, adding that von der Leyen was open to discuss the waiver as well as other options that could be effective.
South Africa and India have said they will revise their waiver text ahead of the next WTO meetings on the topic later in May and on June 8-9.
New Zealand has also joined the waiver backers, saying it welcomed the U.S. statement. British trade minister Liz Truss said Britain was working at the WTO to resolve the issue, without mentioning the waiver.
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ EXPLAINER-COVID-19 vaccine patent waiver talks could still take months
GAVI welcomes Biden move on vaccines, urges U.S. manufacturers to transfer know-how
QUOTES-U.S. backs giving poorer countries access to COVID-19 vaccine patents
Add Chart to Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
- Enrich the conversation
- Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
- Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
- Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
- NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
- Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
- Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
- Only English comments will be allowed.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.